GO
 
     

HOME > MOVIES > 300 (Cale)

300 (Cale)

by Matt Cale

300-1

While I have no direct evidence linking either director Zack Snyder or graphic novelist Frank Miller with the Bush administration, their booming, fascistic, searing flesh feast, 300, achieves what many had thought impossible: making a case for Bush’s war in Iraq so clear, distinct, and fanatical that I half expected an Army recruiting station to be erected at the theater’s exits. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a battleground orgasm; a homoerotic parade of tight abs, facial hair, oiled chests, leather, steel, gritting teeth, and phallic weaponry so overpowering that it’s just about the best movie ever made with jingoistic intent. It’s like a Manowar video with D-Day’s budget. Still, it would not be nearly enough if it merely romanticized warfare as a general rule. In order to be topical, relevant, and most importantly, successful, it must cut through the abstractions and sell the current conflict with all the bombast and mad glory that no one at the Pentagon seems to possess. With the dying embers of Operation Iraqi Freedom reaching few beyond the hopelessly patriotic, a new birth of support is needed more than ever, though Snyder’s film strikes at such a low point that its enthusiasm could be interpreted as desperation rather than inspiration. But it would have been too easy to release such a film in the war’s early days, as the bloodlust engendered might have carried a relatively brief shelf life. One cannot blow their wad too quickly, after all. No, it was right to save it until now. It’s the film Bush has been begging for, and it just might save him from oblivion. If I know its target audience, I have every confidence that it will.

Ostensibly the historical tale of the Battle of Thermopylae, whereby a force of 300 Spartans fought bravely to their doom against a far superior swarm of Persian invaders, the film never lacks the will to play the underdog card whenever the blood needs boiling, but the moral superiority -- the “destiny” of the superior cause -- always belongs to King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) and his chosen few. That Leonidas is a stand-in for Bush is clear from the first scenes, as this man refuses to accept an emissary from Persia, which is obviously itself Bush’s very defiance of the United Nations. Leonidas is a “go it alone” sort, and he hits back at the messenger, which he knows will bring about a great battle. Still, Spartan law requires that the king must secure the approval of a group of mystics (called Ephors) before waging war, which frustrates his manly sense of honor. Yes, folks, the mystics are the U.S. Congress, and once Leonidas screams, “Why must the very law I am sworn to protect prevent me from doing my duty?” the table has been set: Bush will go around Congress (using lies and tricks, brilliantly redefined as “tough choices”), never secure a declaration of war, and send his men to battle, the law be damned. Needless to say, the mystics/Congressmen are ugly, repellant, and literally isolated (they live on a hill, for chrissakes, as in Capitol Hill -- come on guys, don’t make this so easy), which further demonstrates that the king/president is the true guardian of the people. Congress is simpering and weak; Bush is muscle-bound and bold, dashing about with flight suit and codpiece, all in service of the greater good.

Having defied the law and the effete government of Sparta, Leonidas takes his hypermasculine crew to the field of honor, which is a narrow mountain pass that will enable his smaller army to defeat what are continually referred to as “hordes.” And fuck of all fucks, Persians? Fine, a more accurate connection would be with modern-day Iran, but as most Americans happily argue that a turban is a turban, the leap to Iraqis is not so difficult. Amid the deafening noise, thunderclaps, and raging tempests, Leonidas bellows that their cause is for freedom, and that their deaths will secure a better future for their children and grandchildren. As he roars, assorted shots highlight sweat, grime, and rippling flesh, as well as a beard so unmistakably cocklike that it all but penetrates the opposing army with its might. It’s the stereotype writ large: the enemy (Islamic terrorists) fear sex, and as such cover their bodies, while the American/Spartan forces glisten and shine with ejaculatory bluster, never appearing less than the peak of potency. Even though the American forces in Iraq were not technically outnumbered, it need not be a direct transfer to the screen. Leonidas commands a small army, much as Bush leads a miniscule “coalition” of nations. In fact, it is quite apparent that such unpopular wars are far nobler than larger, more coordinated efforts, as martyrdom seeks first to prove that it is misunderstood -- or misunderestimated, as the case may be.

300-2

Leading the mighty Persians is Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro), the Saddam Hussein of the piece, who enslaves his people, uses fear and intimidation to rule his kingdom, harbors ambitions of regional domination, and defies the law by intimidating and invading whomever he likes. Physically, he is a far cry from Saddam (more feminine, to be sure, and wearing more bikini briefs), but by drawing him crudely, and with determined simplicity (he’s evil because he snarls and glares), he is an easy target for our righteous soldiers. No effort is made to shade these men with personalities or traits (hell, the enemies known as Immortals have no faces at all, just mere masks), but that is in line with the propaganda, as the first goal of any military is to squash individuality and stress the “team” above all else, as well as dehumanizing one’s foe. At one point, as the Spartans face their final engagement, they literally become a single unit, with shields upturned, as if submerged into a glob of savage bravery. But they must never show mercy (this is highlighted at every turn, as men on their backs are still speared with relish), which is what Bush himself believes, yet cannot fully articulate before less hardened crowds. The enemy is ruthless, after all, and war on this scale must dispense with such niceties, whether driving enemies into the sea (and taking no prisoners) or arrogantly ignoring long-established treaties. 300 argues again and again for unrelenting, total war, for what else can a righteous nation do when so many others seek to undermine the effort?

Even the opportunistic Theron (Dominic West) relates to our current woes, as he is any number of figures -- John Kerry, John Murtha, Nancy Pelosi, Max Cleland -- who handcuffs the brave leader while hand-holding the enemy (or taking his bribes). Still, he is more Paul Wellstone in the end, as he dies under the gun and is shamed as a spineless coward. Nevertheless, it is a lesson for all those who work for peace, as each has greed and lust in their hearts (rather than victory), and no one who loves freedom could ever oppose erecting a meat grinder in defense of it. The Persian cause is much like our own, where the militarists -- commanding all the authority that matters, at any rate -- cannot conceive of liberty without the requisite slaughter, while the lawmakers are mere fossils without the will to save civilization. Warmongers all, they seek to make their case less brutal by forever linking it with hearth, home, and yes, the children, for whips, chains, and servitude could only result from eunuchlike methods such as “negotiation.” As Spartan women alone give birth to real men, so the American military machine -- whose members are always flattered as the “salt of the earth” and the very heart and soul of the republic -- is the sole method of achieving lasting honor. If war is perpetuated by ennobling its sacrifice, 300 all but argues for its permanent enshrinement in the human condition; inevitable, justifiable, and pure. It is not to be avoided, but indulged; it is the lone avenue to our better selves.

300-3

Leonidas eventually dies with his men in a hopeless final battle, but this is not to be interpreted as America’s loss in the Middle East. Instead, Leonidas’ death is Bush’s self-sacrifice, though he is substituting his presidency for his actual life. Because Bush believes that Iraq will eventually produce success, he has proven willing to risk his entire term of office for history’s final judgment. And if Bush’s gamble mirrors Leonidas’ own example, future generations will hail Bush as a hardened genius not quite suited for his own flaccid times. Such men as Bush will at last be appreciated in the world to come, which could only be the motivation of one who conceives of himself as a savior. Did not Bush claim to seek God’s guidance? Has he not been quite forthright about his conversations with the Almighty? Bush’s historically low popularity rating is a heavy burden, to be sure, but one worth bearing if Iraq is to be the 21st century equivalent of Jeffersonian America. I’ll be damned if Leonidas didn’t also look skyward as his death approached, knowing full well that though his earthly body would be riddled with arrows (leaving a glorious crucifixion pose; you know, to erase any lingering doubt about the film’s message), his soul would live on in the spirit of his people. “Tell others what happened here,” Leonidas instructs the one-eyed messenger (and narrator), and so he does, producing an eternal legend that blurs history into myth, recast as ultimate truth. The ambitions of our current commander in chief are no less grandiose.

 

An additional "fuck you" to the nerds.

300 (Cale) Review
Triumph of the Will(y)
by Matt Cale
Viewed: 26814 Times
Posted: 3.11.07

Syndicate This Review!
(Help us get the word out...add this article to your favorite news & content aggregators.)
Post to del.icio.us Digg This Post to Furl Post to ma.gnolia.com Post to Newsvine Post to Reddit Post to Spurl Post to Yahoo Post to Facebook Post to Facebook Post to Yahoo



USER FEEDBACK


interesting if true..
because that would mean the writers missed the fact that Sparta was, ironically, the earliest fascist state. which, by the way, was eventually was destroyed by...surprise surprise.... imperial overreach
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
allhailzoidberg on 3/11/2007 @ 3:15:38
Lame
I know it took a mind of great creativity and cunning to compare the movie to the current Iraq mess, but maybe try reviewing the actual movie instead of bloviating over your pathetic and easy comparison.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jeff on 3/11/2007 @ 3:18:23
80's Action
Honestly this film has all the building blocks of a 80's action film and should be reviewed as such.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Bran on 3/11/2007 @ 3:48:06
sub-standard
This is a pretty lame review. Some stupid Bush metaphor you managed to construct in your own mind? Not your best. Rewatch Simon Birch.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
jamal on 3/11/2007 @ 4:9:27
Sadly missing the point
Matt, normally you knock these reviews out of the park, and i like that, but you really dropped the ball with this one. I saw 300 last night, and in no way, shape, or form did I see a comparison between 300 and Bush. You seem to be looking for a connection that does not exist. Take the movie for what it is, a movie, and judge it based on those merits and not for some overreaching idea about this movie and bush. it would have been better had you judged the movie on it's action, or special effe
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
hance1986 on 3/11/2007 @ 5:6:25
For chrissakes....
Did any of you nerds listen to the dialogue? It was obvious as hell; I'm not stretching things one iota. Or were you too distracted by the oiled abs?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Matt Cale on 3/11/2007 @ 5:13:08
Cabal
...we heard the dialogue and it is mostly word for word from the graphic novel, which came out in 1998. Unless ol' Frank had a crystal ball and could see into the future, I don't know how he could write Dubya propoganda two years prior.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Yeah, Matt... on 3/11/2007 @ 5:29:14
Not as quite....
The main problem with your comparison is that that 300 (the Graphic Novel/comics) was written back in 1998; seeing as the movie is supposdly very loyel to the source material one souldn't read it as simple "current affairs" analogy. In fact you can even read it the other way- a small number of suicidely brave warriors Vs. the biggest empire in the known world- Surly the hursh living spartns are better compard to the Taliban then to the westernized Americans. 300 is movie based on comic, ba
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Tom Shapira on 3/11/2007 @ 6:16:16
absofuckinlutely
fuck the non-existing political contexts - miller's comic was like an ancient action movie and that's all there is to it. the part about the persians was funny, maybe they should fight canadians instead?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
laryngolog on 3/11/2007 @ 6:17:54
You're kidding right?!
I am sorry to see how upset you are about the current war, I think it is bullshit as well, but your comparisons here are just reaching for something that's not there. The movie follows Miller's 1998 graphic novel EXTREMELY closely, now read that again '1998 graphic novel'. Which in turn is based however loosely on an actual event. I really don't see how you can paint it as a propaganda piece with a message supporting the war. Terrible review in my opinion.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
The Red Dog on 3/11/2007 @ 10:2:07
No, no,no....
YTour reviews aree great but here, no way man. I actually read that there are also people saying that Xerxes is Bush lol the movie is based in a graphic novel from 1998, so that's it, there's no pro Bush message, get over it.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Andres on 3/11/2007 @ 10:51:56
wow
i'm pleasantly surprised that others called you out, Matt. i think you read WAYYY too much into what is really just a popcorny action flick. from what i've read, Frank Miller has apparently become more and more right-wing but back when he did 300, he was pretty liberal. this movie is like the ancient era's version of Top Gun with extra gay and should be treated as such.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
jim on 3/11/2007 @ 11:12:40
come the fuck on
Dude. It's based on a comic book that came out almost ten years ago. Quit trying to find George Bush in every little thing. Fuck, this site has really started sucking lately. I hate Neo-Cons as much as the next guy but sometimes a movie is just mindless entertainment not propaganda.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
reptilicus on 3/11/2007 @ 11:37:19
bad bad bad
Probably the worst review I have ever seen on this site. Please read the graphic novel THEN review this.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Greed on 3/11/2007 @ 12:36:40
Gay guide to Sparta
There will be more gays going to see this movie than Dreamgirls and Chicago combined. "This is Sparta!" Oh yeah? Pass the lube. PS- Fuck Bush(figuratively). Fuck the Greeks(literally).
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
RH on 3/11/2007 @ 12:49:39
no.
if zack snyder's brain was functioning well enough to make a political allegory of any sort, he wouldnt be making movies like 300 and the remake of Dawn of the Dead.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
jordan on 3/11/2007 @ 1:7:11
Laughing
I love Matt's reviews, even the ones I don't agree with. That said, please Matt, stop using the terms "Homo-erotic" and "Jingoistic" in every action movie review. I'm convinced that today's "Male Modern Liberal" is still pissed off that chicks went for the jocks in High School.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Matt's Gorgeous Gut on 3/11/2007 @ 1:24:27
You fucked up
You're obviously really excited to have found an angle on this movie. It just happens to be an idiotic angle. You should delete this embarrassing "review".
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Steen on 3/11/2007 @ 1:27:52
Another opposing opinion
Dude, you by and large make this site, but I, like many others here, really don't see how you saw Bush as the warrior-king who would gladly die beside his men as opposed to the self-declared god who used religion to control his people and demands the submission of other nations. Not to mention the battles, unlike many similar movies, didn't have any people 'waiting around' to take a swing or two. 300's war, despite its reliance on slow-mo, were truly a well organized chaos.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jeffool on 3/11/2007 @ 2:24:10
Hooray!
A triumph over evil! The review that is.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Why on 3/11/2007 @ 2:25:14
Facist and Racist
I actually think Matt is spot on. I know there wasn't supposed to be any explicit politics, but the line about needing to break the law to preserve it, told without any irony, is pretty much the Bush doctrine. And besides, other than analyzing the movie like that, there's almost nothing to talk about. Rest of the dialogue is unbelievably stupid, and it's just a simplistic dumb action movie minus witty one liners. Lastly, this movie was explicitly racist. You had the perfectly physiqued whi
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Miles on 3/11/2007 @ 3:44:18
Maybe if the troops wore Speedos...
On the whole, this movie was just a big mockery of manliness. There was so much gayness, put there on purpose. You think it went over the head of the writer that soldiers in speedos is gay? Nah. The plot had holes, yes; and there was a lot of militarism; but this movie was 90% digital effects. To review it in any other context is sort of absurd.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
St Even on 3/11/2007 @ 4:9:37
Two words:
Greek. Braveheart.
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Diogenes on 3/11/2007 @ 5:14:51
Missed Opportunity
Matt, in the hurry to write something I think you lost a great opportunity to make good review. 300 is NOT an allegory of the current wars, and cannot be construed as such. It is exactly the other way around. The battle of Thermopylae, as many other western MYTHS (the defeat of Carthage by Scipio, the liberation of Spain by "El Cid", the epic of Charles Martel, The Crusades), have shaped our view of the "east". It is Bush that want us to think that he is a sort of heir of Leonidas, King Richard
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Raynald de Chatillon on 3/11/2007 @ 6:1:34
Freedom isn't free, guys...
I know most of you are bitching about how the graphic novel was written back in '98, but you'd have to be blind not to see the connections between the movie and the Iraq war. Having read the book (which doesn't have half the political connotations the movie has), this movie was full of jingoistic bullshit. Leonidas's wife actually fucking says "Freedom isn't free."
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Seth on 3/11/2007 @ 7:22:43
Shit
Oh Cale, you were hitting them out of the park in the humorous thread where you proved every movie had a slant, but this one is weak as all hell. Barely any of the comparisons actually work, and even then they are weak. You need to re-review this one.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Tofu on 3/11/2007 @ 9:41:53
pretty damn weak.
Sorry, but your argument is too thin to stretch it as much as you have. While 300 was tailor-made to appeal to today's Marine, it is no more politically skewed than the average Golan-Globus production. That said, the homoerotica and racism literally explodes off the screen in hot, spurting fountains. So much more could be said about the film's actual content. You really let us down with this one, man.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
teufelscheiss on 3/11/2007 @ 9:56:47
Dude, Come On
Does everything on this site have to be about the god damned Bush regime? You guys are starting to sound like stoners on a couch lately. "Dude, ever notice how The Smurfs is a metaphor for the Right-Wing Christian Movement? Think about it!"
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
VonCouch on 3/11/2007 @ 11:29:07
Gotta be joking
"Freedom isn't free." You're right- that saying was souly created by the Bush regime; it never existed prior. This review takes paranoia to the next level and is off the rocker 100%. It was a comic movie. Review it as such instead of interjecting your own agenda.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Dynamo on 3/11/2007 @ 11:49:01
!!!
Fuck all the retarded nerds, this review is great. Keep up the good work Matt. And please get rid of the porn at the bottom of the screen.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
!!! on 3/11/2007 @ 11:56:04
Warriors of the World
The Iraq stuff is obvious if you have a brain, but apparently it is coincidental. The real comparison is to Manowar, which is the first thing I said to my wife afterward. Bottom line: 300 is pure shit. SPARTANS!!!
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Oiled Abs on 3/12/2007 @ 2:24:56
ridiculous
I hate to echo prior posts, but the review of this movie as a political pamphlet for George Bush is ludicrous. I honestly don't know what to make of movie reviewers that tear into anything remotely warlike as a voice for the right wing. Normally I love reading these reviews, however, this time, I'm going to ask you to emasculate yourself by running around in panties in the privacy of your own home, rather than bring it out for the rest of us to see in HTML.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jeremy on 3/12/2007 @ 3:47:12
Good review
I thought it was blatant, with lines like "freedom isn't free." which is not in the comic books, nor are all the scenes with the senate and corrupted politician, Theron.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Huydini on 3/12/2007 @ 5:7:13
-
"Anything warlike" is _per_definition_ right-wing propaganda. And fuck that. Go, Cale!
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
- on 3/12/2007 @ 5:46:07
worthwhile
for some of the younger/more naive viewers of this film, some brain cells may have been activated by this review. whether one agrees or not.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
hbrodie on 3/12/2007 @ 6:16:15
Game attempt.
You did a good job drawing parallels, but the truth is that those elements you cited from 300 as mirroring the Bush Iraq War ARE HISTORICAL FACTS. The setting, the conditions, even many of the quotes (except the freedom one) are recorded history. It's too mixed to say ZS or FM purposefully did that. That's just how it all went down (except dumbed down and launched into retarded hyperbole b/c FM wouldn't know creativity if it neutered him). If you want me to detail it for you, I can. Besides
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Jonathan on 3/12/2007 @ 7:38:09
Propaganda
I agree with Matt. Though this film is beautifully shot, it's no more than another "Top Gun." To sum up the movie, Middle East is Evil, Western Ideology is good. Keep up the honest and above all Ruthless style of writing.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
TheConsumers on 3/12/2007 @ 8:0:41
ha!
Fuck these zealous nerds, Cale. I love your reviews and probably always will, even if you strike at sacred cows of nerddom. I really loved this line: "It’s like a Manowar video with D-Day’s budget." Who could argue against that?
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
jojo on 3/12/2007 @ 11:13:59
Good Iraq Analogy, Review still sucks.
Miller was a producer on this film and he altered it to fit the times. 300 is shot like a two hour Prison shower scene. Half naked men thrusting their instruments of war into many other naked men in underwear. Watch the first 30 minutes of Saving Pvt. Ryan before you see 300. The landing scene is brutal, the air is thick with Fear,its claustrophobic, its paralyzing. The battlefield is a chaotic game of numbers, life is cheap. 300 is not war, its a bench warmers gay dream!
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
VOIVOD on 3/12/2007 @ 11:39:11
"Nerds". Yeah, RIGHT...
I'm generally a fan of your reviews, which I often find both funny and insightful. Here, it was nothing more than over-analyzing the political nature of a film that wasn't seriously political to begin with - it's almost like any action film in the 80's. So, no, I don't defend this movie for being based on a comic (which I haven't read) as much as I find it lazy to denounce a film ENTIRELY because of speculative political content.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
nick on 3/12/2007 @ 12:33:35
Jesus Christ of Fuck
You are retarded. Like.. you make kids with autism look like MENSA candidates. The fact that you wrote a novel COMPLETELY fabricating an entirely ungrounded sesspool of crap shows that your mouth is way too far down on Bush's cock. - The Spartans didn't INVADE anything - The Spartans were DEFENDING their lands, not their material worth Most of the other crap you made up was a loose account of ACTUAL HISTORY. So basically, your entire review states that Spartan... history... happened
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Phrozt on 3/12/2007 @ 12:33:53
Ha
Agree with what Jonathan and Phrozt have said above. The reviewer seems to think that the elements which resemble GOP ideology were made up for the film, which only belies his ignorance of the actual history involved. Sparta is portrayed as a fascist right-wing state because Sparta was a fascist right-wing state. Where the comparisons are not contrived, they are based on a complete misunderstanding of Spartan culture. It's a shame, because the Spartan outlook and its complications offer a ri
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Will on 3/12/2007 @ 1:9:27
Now..
...imagine the 300 LARP.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Larper on 3/12/2007 @ 2:11:58
All my points were already stated...
Which just leaves me to point out that you would have been one of the babies dropped off the cliff
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Tarnin on 3/12/2007 @ 4:57:23
I'm a genius!
After the onslaught of zit-faced rebellion on display, I'm convinced that this is the greatest review I've ever written. God I'm good...
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Matt Cale on 3/12/2007 @ 6:13:25
sure
You have obviously been caught. This review sucks. Even if it were all true, ranting about the Bush administration(again) is just dull. Your Hills have Eyes review proved you can make absurd metaphors out of anything. Try harder with this one.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
jamal on 3/12/2007 @ 7:29:04
predictable
What about actually reviewing the movie as a movie instead of making retarded analogies? Your verbal diarrhea is becoming tiresome. It seems that all the McLard you eat is finding a way into your brain. At least Jonny wrote some fairly amusing drunken ramblings.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
some guy on 3/12/2007 @ 9:57:36
Congrats Matt!
Being the target of nerd rage puts you on the grand level of other such noteworthy people like Britney Spears and Tim Burton! I can see why you're so proud of this review! (So, when did you change from reviews to performance art? Or was it a gradual evolution?)
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
J.Someguy on 3/13/2007 @ 4:48:52
Cale You fuggin stinkbag
You don't understand ancient histrory or decent comic books you fat ugly nurd. Fuck you. 300 is the best film ever and no who watches it is gay except for you and your mum.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Leonidas on 3/13/2007 @ 7:49:04
Inevitable
Ok, guys? Chill. Sparta -was- the prototypical fascist state. It's obvious Cale wouldn't miss the parallels. And every action movie needs the hero to be opposed by pansy lawyers/traitors/pinkos. When your lead is a King, it takes a "Congress" to fill that role.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
F. Jardim on 3/13/2007 @ 11:3:36
umm, dudes ....
every fuckin' leader throughout history has deemed it neccessary "to break the law to preserve it". that's nothing new, it's just that W's willing to say it out loud. shit, you could find parallels with 300 and pretty much every empire: nazis vs the brits, americans vs the british empire, etc. this is why the story resonants
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
dharmabum71@gmail.com on 3/13/2007 @ 12:19:40
Why did I even read this shit?
I was disappointed to see the tie back to the war. Thought too hard about it, would have liked to have read a review about the damn movie, not the war that we are all tired of hearing or reading about.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Let down on 3/13/2007 @ 6:29:00
Fuckin Rubbish
What a load of twat I expected so much more from this site but no you jump on the bandwagon. even the iranians are at it moaning on about a successful film raping their culture it just like borat all over again.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
ilander66 on 3/13/2007 @ 7:13:13
The review misses the point.
Matt hasn´t pointed the real bad part of the film: it´s a fucking green screen fraud. OK, it follows the comic to the point but I have the comic at home so fuck the film for the argument. And if they wanted to film epic battles they could as well have gone to fucking Harrod´s on sales day for the ones they put on the film are small and SUCK BIG TIME.
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Illuminatus on 3/13/2007 @ 7:21:01
you naysayers ought to shut the fuck up
Don't want to sound ass kissing, but Matt's DEAD ON about this piece of republican crap, 300. If 300 is not a mirror reflection of the Bush brain warp, then tell me all you naysayers of this efficient review, WHAT THE FUCK IS?! the one's that are least aware, like 80's action movies, are the ones that demand the most serious of political analysis! The movies that are only made for fun and popcorn are the ones most dangerously coded to warp our minds!!! 300 aint no exception! Just becaus
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
the truth!!!! on 3/14/2007 @ 2:20:15
Off in left field
Unfortunately for you none Classics majors, there is no other way to depict the Battle of Thermopylae. Both Herodotus and Diodorus depict the Persian wars as democracy vs autocracy, free men vs subjects, etc. Of course the connections are painfully obvious to the contemporary world. Remember though that the movie was written from the perspective of a survivor looking to garner support around the Greek world.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Nick on 3/14/2007 @ 4:57:47
triumph of the willy!!
holy crap, when did this site get invaded by the Dork Army?? Who cares that Miller wrote the book in 98 - it's so obvious why it was made into a movie now! Hell, everything Shakespeare wrote has been made into an analogy for shit that happened long after he was dead. Movie sucked balls, CGI crap, like all pro-war propaganda it's gaaaayyy
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
sargio on 3/15/2007 @ 1:26:34
Both right and wrong
Cale's review fails in that it sees the movie as a direct metaphor for the Iraq war, which is incredibly short-sighted. However, he's dead-on in that this is a full-blown conservative film. Whatever, I say -- I can't deal with differing viewpoints, although most of the screaming polemics on this site can not.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
MBI on 3/15/2007 @ 9:23:03
Worst Review... Ever
I've loved this site for a long time and I've recommended it to many friends but reading this review makes me a bit embarrassed about my recommendations. This is by far the worst review ever posted here. Matt Cale has always been the best thing about this site but the comparisons drawn here are simply ridiculous and show a complete lack of understanding of history. I'm not going to bother repeating what other people have said in previous comments - but come on, if you want to call yourself a ser
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
The Chief on 3/15/2007 @ 9:40:15
sadly...
...like every other review that tries to point out parallels to actual political events, this one misses the point entirely. The question isn't whether the Greek or the Persians stand for America, or whatever. The problem isn't even that this movie blatantly depicts fascism. That would be fine by me, since Sparta is nothing but a myth today. All this horsecrap only distracts from the main point: That this is, after all, an incredibly bad movie.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
topnerd on 3/15/2007 @ 1:23:41
Y'what?
Parallel historic events? Who'd have thought it? I really loathe the way important historical events are taken and associated with America, one of the few countries in the world to lack a history of its own. In the end, the Spartans fought and died for something that 99% of Americans today don't understand. Your average US grunt probably isn't aware of what he's doing. Average IQ 70 and all that, just like ol' commander-in-chief, 'Brains' Bush. This review doesn't even discuss the film
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Lollacopter on 3/15/2007 @ 4:49:46
mixed reaction...
While I don't necessarily agree with the review, I think Cale's point does have some merit. However, it's by and large mostly because history tends to repeat itself. Though in this case Cale might be giving the Right more credit than they deserve here.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jewel on 3/16/2007 @ 12:40:47
Cale is deluded
The most hilarious part of all this is Cale calling OTHER PEOPLE nerds. Have you seen the guy? Or his wife?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jokey on 3/17/2007 @ 12:42:31
sad
I just cannot believe that a review of this shitty computerized movie is still drawing this much of a backlash, when constant disregards for civil rights and unwarranted wars go on every day with barely a whimper from the general public. The human race really is fucked.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
sargio on 3/17/2007 @ 1:27:09
shit
you forgot to mention how fucking awful the film was. after i saw it i blew up a gasoline truck and threw my cat in as a sacrifice to my jewish god Clawgrub to repent for paying for this.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Michael S. on 3/17/2007 @ 2:48:30
not a quality ruthless review
This review reminds me of every bad party in college, where drunk kids with eyebrow piercings feel the need to babble about Bush & politics at 1AM, while presenting no solutions of their own. If you don't win the election, try again in 4 years with a better turd sandwich, asshats.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Big Ben on 3/17/2007 @ 6:32:28
REM's Politics and Satan's record collection.
"Violence is cool...but only when it is sung about constantly or portrayed in cherished moments from my youth in 80's action movies." I really like this site. I really like most of what Matt does. The politics just date the material and make it preachy and annoying.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Incitatus on 3/17/2007 @ 10:45:44
Cale is a fucking asshole
This site hasn't been the same since Johnny left. Fuck head Cale is just as big a flaming asshole as the neo-cons.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
loopy64 on 3/17/2007 @ 4:5:56
Silly review, silly comments
Comparing this movie to the American-muslim conflict is really primitive and banal. Everybody saw that coming, and it did. None of the people who made such silly criticisms ever thought that the comic and the idea of the film predated all those conflicts. Also, modern terms such as "fascist" cannot be applied to ancient states of cultures. It just makes you look ignorant about history and the evolution of our modern civilisation when you use them. Despite what bitter viewers and reviwers might c
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Adam on 3/17/2007 @ 5:49:43
dicks
also cocks
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
magus on 3/18/2007 @ 4:23:47
farewell ruthless...
When i was young and i had a crush on a girl, everything reminded me of her no matter how irrelevant it was. I guess Mr.Cale is having wet dreams with Mr.Bush. And please for old times sake change the name of the site...let it be remembered as it was in its old glory days not as the caletryingtoberuthless parody.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
joe on 3/18/2007 @ 7:49:44
Hoo boy...
Who cares if Miller wrote it years ago? PNAC was planning the Iraq War in 1997, ya tools. For me, the biggest sin this movie committed was that the violence sucked. Sanitized, CGI video game fake-ass blood spatter crap. I watched Commando after this to remind myself what onscreen carnage should look like.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
False Prophet on 3/19/2007 @ 3:3:50
Wrong
You have it all backwards. The only similarity between the battling nations in "300" and the current U.S. involvement in the Middle East is... Persia=UnitedStates=tyrantgovernment Spartans=Iraqi"insurgents"=people defending their homeland.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
shitknuckle on 3/19/2007 @ 1:52:50
Yes!
I was going on almost this exact same rant when my friends told me to come to your site and read this. You articulate my thoughts on the movie exactly and far better than I could. Thank you, you've garnered a new fan.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Adam on 3/21/2007 @ 2:19:18
Bleh
Easily the gayest and most violent movie to not get an 80's action review.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Gluagh on 3/21/2007 @ 11:49:14
barbarians, man!
the irony is that at that time, the persians were by far the higher developed civilization, having already built a huge empire with (for example) some kind of "pony express" to transport informations. greek cities were a small territory of minor interest within their hegemonic sphere. maybe compareable to the usa and middle america now. the movie (and western civilization as a whole) takes sides with the barbarians. right movie at the right time i'd say.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
dingo on 3/22/2007 @ 5:44:46
As a Greek...
As a Greek who knows the exact story I would say that: 1.The invaders of the story were the Persians (Whilst now the invaders are the US) 2.Sparta truly was a fascist country, but surprisingly, women had rights that in “democratic” Athens never had. 3.The fact was that Spartans had to die, not only because they were stupid enough to believe in omens, but also because that was the only way that the rest of the Greek army will have the time to get prepare for the forthcoming battles. [After t
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Rankin on 3/22/2007 @ 7:16:05
300
Matt: Political propoganda aside, you didn't once mention just how BAD this movie really was. The night I saw it at the Vista in LA, the audience howled with laughter at the dialogue. A pathetic attempt at Gladiator 2..
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Rob on 3/23/2007 @ 3:49:45
A Persuasive Argument
you really had a problem with the fact the Spartans were fighting Persians? Who would you rather they fought? Cossacks? Gauls? It's as if you think that the Battle of Thermopylae itself was an analogy for the Iraq war.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Sweet Jimmy on 3/24/2007 @ 1:9:34
Read some History dude
how stupid can some people be???? how much...simple understanding does it need to make the difference between a movie that talks about 400bc and todays events???? and how f stupid someone has to be, to compare the fucking todays events, with what happened that long ago?? Boy, you are definately lost in space. please do make a research online, read some stuff about the Greek history, about the Thermopyles(Hot Gates) Battle, and then feel free to tell me how the fuck you can compare actual hi
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Dimitri on 3/25/2007 @ 2:18:11
wtf
whats with the bush rant...
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
what the fuck on 3/27/2007 @ 1:3:54
Lame
Lame Film. Lame Review. It may come as a shock people but There are more than just You Yanks fighting in Iraq
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Cyberfish on 3/27/2007 @ 10:23:18

Fuck you and your iraq war bullshit. Just shut the fuck up.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
on 3/29/2007 @ 10:55:32
Waste of a good review
There are so many directions the review of this movie could have gone, a anti-Bush rant being the weakest of them. It was moderately amusing, but could have been so much better. You chose poorly Matt Cale.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
thetio on 3/30/2007 @ 3:17:42
uuum
i dunno about the bush analogy but the gayness was brutal..there was more oiled naked ass then in all 80's movies combined i can see your POV on this but it wasnt ment that way its just a good movie full of FX filled battles and mild humor i did feel disgusted hearing marines say"those guys are like us" when i was leaving the theater..but side from that it was a good use of $20 (5 for soda)
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
lordpoke on 4/8/2007 @ 1:5:40
Just so we're clear
it's "Definitely" not "Definately". oh, and "you're" is the proper contraction of "you are"; "your" indicates possession. if you're going to attempt to appear intelligent, at least know how to spell and contract things properly. christ.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
aeonopolis on 4/10/2007 @ 6:33:56
Piss poor review
Have to agree with most of the above. Although I haven't read the comic book (I'm an adult), was just an incredibly gay action film (with the obligatory right wing overtones) about a famous historic battle. Only similarity with war in Iraq - inevitable defeat. Liked the beard/cock metaphor though. Did anyone else wonder what orcs were doing in ancient Greece?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
EHP on 4/12/2007 @ 1:33:01
Nerd blood, indeed
Psh, fuck all these nerds. 300 is the Passion of The Christ for comic-book (graphic novel, for the more elitist ones)losers. Although I haven't seen this movie yet... I decided I didn't want to after seeing the trailer . ZZzzzZzz
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Daedalus on 4/12/2007 @ 3:21:15
What??
I don't understand: it's not such a stretch to see why a fruity, jingoistic piece of shit like this is crammed down everyone's throat while a far superior film like Kingdom Of Heaven is virtually ignored. Anyone without half his brain up his ass can clearly see how EVERYTHING is politically motivated in Bush's Amerika. How could you not draw a comparison to the war? Oh right if you're as dumb as shit you can't. Stupid fucks.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Mike The Prick on 4/18/2007 @ 2:26:51
Not bad...
Yes the political similarities are glaring, the racial sterotyping are concerning and to call the movie a gross distortion of history is both an understatement and irrelevant (as a movie is not about history, but about entertainment). Although imo 300 is what it is in order to appeal to its target audience (and make money) rather than to push a particular politial agenda. Hilariously written review tho :).
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Gladius on 4/21/2007 @ 9:35:29
Get over it!!!
If anything Xerxes is Bush and the Persian Empire is the NWO with the USA as its pit bull. The 300 Spartans and Greece would represent the Taliban or Iraqi resitance AKA the Muhadjeen. It is the USA that is invading. Worse still is the historical innacuracy of the flick. It was upwards of 7,000 Greeks that met Xerxes at Thermopylae. It was after the Persians found the goat path that they were ordered to leave and there were 700 Thespians who remained and died with the 300. Anyways Sparta was a m
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Pandemonium on 4/25/2007 @ 11:1:51
Amazing.
The only thing wrong with the review itself is that the film's Bush/Iraq analog is so obvious that it doesn't bear such thorough examination, and yet the masses insist that there's nothing to the point. How fucking blunt are you people? But perhaps more interesting is the fact that people are getting so passionate about such a shitfest of a movie. The historical events have extrodinary narrative potential, but the movie scarfed horsecock.
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Penpen on 4/27/2007 @ 7:22:04
Lame
Fuck, Cale, have you ever read classics? Jeesus Christ, to compare stuff that actually occurred to the debacle is Iraq is fucking ignorant. READ SOME FUCKING HISTORY YOU DRIPPY CUNT!
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Kiwi on 4/28/2007 @ 5:41:42
NewsBliss
They used NewsBliss to manage this movie.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Shawn on 4/30/2007 @ 10:30:16
Overstimulated American Commenters, Shut Up.
I adore how everything tells Matt Cale to "read on history" even though this may be perhaps (and intentionally!) the most inaccurate piece of "historical" film making? You don't seem to understand that Iranian society back then was every bit as sophisticated as the Greeks, and there was no Chains n' BDSM Arabo-Africans sporting around in the Persian empire as missionaries, or even as soldiers. This movie was a mess on all aspects that makes a film interesting: -Innovation -Interest -I
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Herro on 5/13/2007 @ 1:53:40
Hilarious!
Jesus christ this is the most awesome review I've seen. Facetious to the end. Protip, though: don't suggest things that NERD RAGE will invalidiate with claims like "the comic was written in 1998" because it makes it less plausible and less ragey from anyone smart. It's funniest when someone intelligent goes on a rampage or accepts some retarded out of someone's ass bullshit.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Anonymous on 5/23/2007 @ 7:43:31
A stupid, ignorant interpretation of a tale that was written before Bush Jr took office
For fuck's sake, Cale, stop hitting the bottle so often. One could just as reasonably (though that's not really saying much, considering how shallow your arguments are) say that the Spartans represent Islamic fundamentalists protecting their homeland from an imperialistic force that in turn represents the United States. Of course, you're so goddamn shallow that you can't look past the ethnicities of the two sides. I don't think you're the one who should be preaching about racial insensitivity he
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Anonymous on 5/23/2007 @ 11:8:57
You suck
You are still a morron with no life and aparently no talent... thats the worst review ever it was even worser than the movie it self lol hows that even possible?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
You suck on 5/24/2007 @ 6:57:43
What an idiot.
Terribly review. Sounds like you just regurgitated your Liberal talking points that have been run into the ground. I find it even funnier that there are Conservatives who make the reverse claims, saying that Persia represents the U.S. (a larger force invading a smaller nation). Since neither side can agree whose propaganda is the correct one, why not just shut the fuck up? Liberals and Conservatives both need to get a grip.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Get over it. on 6/4/2007 @ 4:43:25
Good review...
This was a really good review of a film that I feel to be the most facist thing that I've seen come from American cinema in the last 25 years (except mabye Pearl Harbor). The genereal sentiment that the film is anything other than propaganda amongst the public strikes me as absurd, but is a testimony to how effective the film is as propaganda. Good propaganda is the stuff that people will angrily defend as not being propaganda. Even with that, I don't understand how people that claim to be "left
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Robin on 6/6/2007 @ 9:16:01
Idiot
Your review is irrelevant simply because the graphic novel series on which 300 is based was published in 1998. Oh, that's when Clinton was in office, by the way.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
J. on 6/9/2007 @ 1:8:30
GOOD JORB IDORT
Jesus christ, I sure hope this review was an attempt at trolling, even though your follow-up seems to deny this. You're acting like a fat little kid that screwed up big time and now tries to hit the people pointing out his failure by going BAWWWWWWWWWWWW and flailing his flabby arms. You lash out at "nerds", yet your response looks like typical nerd rage. Good job, you're making yourself look more pathetic than my 90 year old incontinent gramps. *tumbsup*
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Holy shit! on 8/20/2007 @ 6:26:56
A rare occurrence: Cale tries to jam his metaphorically square cock in a metaphorically round hole.
A rare occurrence: Cale tries to jam his metaphorically square cock in a metaphorically round hole. I agree with you there can be good propaganda (Sicko). I agree with you that there can be not so good propaganda (Triumph of the Will) - understatement. I despise Bush, neo-cons, and hideously, self-serving, distorters of truth for selfish (read: to fill deep seated insecurities) reasons. But I am afraid that on this review you fall into the "despised" category. Sure you may at time
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Laspi on 9/6/2007 @ 12:4:41
Sad liberal nonsense
Its funny how liberal types are so quick to call conservatives simple minded war mongers when they themselves are so willing to provoke them to act that way by saying the stupid hippie crap that they do. "ooohh, swords are phallic symbols." Just because the film glorifies war doesn't mean that it glorifies bush. And newsflash, it's telling the story of something that happened in barbaric times when war was a way of life, of course its glorified. Geez, your trying so hard to think outside the bo
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Rob on 10/14/2007 @ 1:39:59
Tsk tsk
As the 1-year anniversary of this review approaches, I can't believe Cale still hasn't gotten over it. Anybody who defends his review is an idiot, because Cale ignores the fact that no one here is defending the film itself. We simply realize the film was not a Bush metaphor, and for Cale to act as if "we just don't get it" is proof he lost his mind long ago.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Squirrel on 2/26/2008 @ 1:25:40
Wanna leave feedback on this review? Click here!
 
       
         


 

 
  A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M
N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
 

RUTHLESS T-SHIRTS
You want ‘em, we got ‘em

JOIN THE RUTHLESS FORUM!


"I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally." -- W.C. Fields

The Quote Du Jour Archive.