GO
 
     

HOME > MOVIES > THE SIMPSONS MOVIE

THE SIMPSONS MOVIE

by Erich Shulte

Like most "Simpsons" adherents, I was expecting this film to be an utter disaster. The TV show has sunk to the credibility and integrity of a Mexican infomercial, without being nearly as entertaining. When the good reviews for the film came out, I crossed my fingers that the producers had saved the funniest jokes from the commercials, which indeed they had. I laughed several times, like I laugh at Fresca. There was nothing here that I'll be routinely be dropping into casual conversation 10 years from now. No new scripture. Of course, what is to be expected when the filmmakers make so stupid a decision as to replace the flawless Renier Wolfcastle with Arnold and then seem to want to use Arnold to mock Bush? I'm not sure what the thinking here is. To me it seems like replacing Otto with Tommy Chong and using Chong to make fun of Robert Downey Jr. What's the point? President Worlfcastle – that could have been fucking funny.

A more faithful person would have hoped that The Simpsons would find a way to toy with the big summer movie, alternatively mocking and embracing it as the show once did with all sorts of conventions. Or maybe hang a left and completely ignore the expected template and give us something like a serial killer flick. Instead this is summer movie boilerplate, hitting its pinnacle when Homer is about to be shot, but then the shooter is hit from behind by ... why, Maggie, of all people! The satire, parody and cultural play are a cut above Short Circuit, but nothing like the old days. Brilliant marketing, though. The film is just funny enough to draw in the adult fans but is really one of those summer flicks aimed mostly at kids, which is decent enough that parents can tolerate being dragged back to it seven times. I guess David Silverman has been hankering for an ivory backscratcher, and Matt Groening has been betting against the Harlem Globetrotters.

Oh, and once I sawr a blimp.   

THE SIMPSONS MOVIE Review
hah-ha. Well, not so much.
by Erich Shulte
Viewed: 8005 Times
Posted: 7.28.07

Syndicate This Review!
(Help us get the word out...add this article to your favorite news & content aggregators.)
Post to del.icio.us Digg This Post to Furl Post to ma.gnolia.com Post to Newsvine Post to Reddit Post to Spurl Post to Yahoo Post to Facebook Post to Facebook Post to Yahoo



USER FEEDBACK


Donut
I need a Dooonuuuuuut!
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Homer on 7/29/2007 @ 5:41:30
Review way too long
I couldn't make it through. Two paragraphs on a major new release is too much.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Erichruleshaha on 7/29/2007 @ 2:51:23
On another note
Hey, what the Hell is up with the forum?
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Wombat Terkleson on 7/29/2007 @ 9:22:18
That's it?
Only two paragraphs? Bleh. And did you go to 7-11 yet?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Nqn on 7/30/2007 @ 5:34:47
Ruthless - Homer great reviewing
stupid Ruthless reviewers - think they're so great... (Thanks for saving me money. Now i can afford all the crappy merchandise).
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Ruthless - Homer great reviewing on 8/4/2007 @ 3:19:51
The death of Renier Wolfcastle
The reason that the character Renier Wolfcastle was retired is that he was voiced by Phil Hartman, and out of respect for his memory The Simpsons creators retired all of his characters for new episodes after his untimely death. So that is why Troy McClure and Renier Wolfcastle and a few other characters haven't been in the series since back when. Personally, outside of Troy McClure, who was really THE Phil Hartman character, I think they could've kept the others and had someone else voice th
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Baramos on 8/7/2007 @ 1:34:48
Bullshit!
Rainier Wolfcastle is voice by Harry Shearer, not Hartman. The character got married just a few months ago... not that I watch the new shit or anything.
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Mr Burns on 8/7/2007 @ 6:1:56
What the...?
Only 2 paragraphs? No purple prose filler? No gay sex? Oh, Matt didn't write it.
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Hmmmm on 8/7/2007 @ 6:28:03
What the hell?
So was it good? Was it bad? How does it differ from the TV series? What of the story line? Re-review it properly you lazy fucking gimp, or better still, let someone else do it.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Destyre on 8/9/2007 @ 1:24:48
Super boring
I fell asleep watching it half way through. What happened to the quick wit, if you close your eyes you'll miss some funny stuff? This load of crap went half hour at a time before something remotely funny would happen. Worst episode of Simpsons I ever tried to watch
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
cpg here on 8/10/2007 @ 6:48:16
devolution
... that's what i'll call this. ruthless, though great in previous days, ... well, sucks. no wit, no shit - no nothing. ruthless: my ass. fuck this. btw: the movie truly sucked...
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
GuschIhrWixer on 8/12/2007 @ 4:46:41
really neato
this was a really neato review of a really shitty movie. yaaaaaay-eeeee. i had a swell time reading it. i am happy now.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
jj solari on 8/13/2007 @ 12:16:36
What Happened???
Faithful since the Tracey Ulman show, I didnt see the movie yet. But looking at this seasons episodes they must be similar to the film because the whole show feels weird and the jokes are not quick as they were b4 the film came out. They fucked up man. They shouldnt have made a movie. I think it was their death sentence or they are really tired of making the show. They are really testing my loyalty to the show. Has anyone watched this seaeson?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
RH on 12/17/2007 @ 3:3:00
I still like The Simpsons
but it sure ain't what it used to be and it isn't a must-see on Sunday night. That's <i>Family Guy</i> for me, at least.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
r€nato on 4/16/2008 @ 12:16:23
Wanna leave feedback on this review? Click here!
 
       
         


 

 
  A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M
N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
 

RUTHLESS T-SHIRTS
You want ‘em, we got ‘em

JOIN THE RUTHLESS FORUM!


"Old people don't need companionship. They need to be isolated and studied so that it can be determined what nutrients they have that might be extracted for our personal use." -- Homer Simpson

The Quote Du Jour Archive.