GO
 
     

HOME > RANTS > FUCK RON PAUL

FUCK RON PAUL

by Christian

2008-01-28


Most pieces written about this diminutive Lestat are swarmed upon by throngs of the shit-witted; every single word dismantled, rearranged, and cannibalized in a tragic parody of debate. It’s as if SkyNet became self-aware then suffered a major stroke. Just as it’s true that you can judge any book by its cover, you can judge a person by the type of monsters who vouch for them. Ron Paul’s libertarians have taken it upon themselves to cast the majority of Government actions as wasteful and have promised themselves a wonderland where people are untaxed, welfare is at a bare minimum if at all, and the King of England stays out of your face. As it follows, every presidential candidate needs a theme song, one that telegraphs a plagiarized set of emotions that seeks to capture the rapturous feelings of the uninformed masses that follow them. For Paul and his supporters, that song would be “Dancing With Myself.”

Ron Paul fandom (and oh yes, it is fandom) is a collection of mental illnesses poorly diagnosed, not unlike Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, depression, or being Jewish. There are no Ron Paul devotees who do not consider themselves libertarians – which poses a problem for this discussion, because not all libertarians are mentally ill. They are merely wrong. Even worse, these modern day Hare Krishna’s could no more explain to you the basic tenets of libertarianism beyond the standard mantra of “gaht damn federal government” than GW Bush could pronounce “encephalitis” correctly on his first try.

The rub is here, and the rub is queer, and we better get used to it: All stripes of weirdo death-cult, wannabe Heavens Gate and Branch Davidian, square-headed Danny Bonaduce-led racist outfits have strapped themselves to the patina of constitutional freedom because they know it’s the only way to avoid having ATF tanks roll over their necks. Under the wizard’s robe, a whole variety of little cockmonglers have thrived: UFO conspiracy handmaidens, survivalists, moon-landing nuts – the type of people who aren’t against big government, but the grown-up world in general.

At the same time, Paul has found a foothold across the political divide with young impressionable folk who have the clarity to see that something is critically wrong with the project of capitalistic democracy, but not the wit to realize that he’s the problem, not the cure. These devotees have a fantasy that Paul is about ending corruption, reorganizing power and doing away with interference. This fantasy is allowed to grow because so many people want these things, at such a high pitch, that they are willing to take any old cunt to get it. Ron Paul is any old cunt and common sense needs to win out.

Mr. Paul, pull up a seat, we need to talk.

The situation is this; the economy is fucked, poor people are three weeks away from resorting to mass cannibalism, your country has taken a giant Sunday morning shit on the dinner service of every country below, oh lets see, all the fucking meridians. Race, no matter how you think it’s played out until now, is going to play a major role in each of these things.

The problem isn’t issue 13 of the 1985 Ron Paul “Hang Dem Niggers High” Gazette – that’s actually fine. That just makes you dangerously thick and irresponsible to the point of clinical lunacy. The problem is not to be found in some obscure quote on which you so often claim to be misrepresented; the real problem is your dull-witted friends. Somewhere over the last year, ‘liberty’ has become a synonym for all sorts of freshman-level dick-sizing about the worst possible ideas for governance the human mind can produce. Worse yet, they’ve taken on the mantel of victim status and paranoia so completely that any slight is met with an orgasmic avalanche of New World Order, Trilateral Commission, second gunman on the grassy knoll finger pointing.

This brings us to his patois with the media. He is ‘pushed out of debates’ and ‘not taken seriously’ by a colluding fourth estate apparatus, according to the RLOVELUTION. In reality, Ron Paul is ignored by the media because he doesn’t offer them a product they can sell. What does Paul offer the media, a sub par professional wrestler once known as Isaac Yankem and a bit of bitching about Roe vs. Wade?

By making his exclusion part of his grand narrative of government control, his presence poisons the debate. Ron, you were excluded because you offer nothing. Now you sell yourself to college kids on the back that they were witness to your exclusion, to something dodgy happening. If they could film it with their cellphones and upload it to Youtube, they would.

So it’s that at every step he has shrouded a discussion of the real issue underneath the arcane conspiratorial rubric he specializes in to hide the fact that when push comes to shove, he’s just another conservative. He’s like George Costanza blaming his impotency on the fact that Elaine faked her orgasms with Jerry.

So, just to review, let’s see how the Shroud of Paul works:



Life Under the Ron Paul RLOVEUTION
--------------------------------------------------


Paul Policy: Pulls troops out of Korea, Japan and Europe, pulls US out of NATO, UN, WTO, NAFTA.
What People See: America is great.
Reality: China is great.

Paul Policy: Pulls out of International Criminal Court completely.
What People See: Don't let my son be tried for war crimes.
Reality: War crimes.

Paul Policy: Pulling out of Iraq completely and immediately.
What People See: Less Iraq, More Britney!
Reality: Good idea, but war crimes and a destroyed Iraq ripe for the mullahs.

Paul Policy: Let Iran have the bomb.
What People See: No interference in international affairs.
Reality: Iran does the Kid-n-Play dance.

Paul Policy: Sending nothing but a ‘moral statement’ to Darfur instead of money and troops.
What People See: More money for Bush bonuses.
Reality: Darfur officially renamed 'The Badlands'.

Paul Policy: End to Free Trade Agreements.
What People See: They're taking our jobs!
Reality: They are taking your jobs anyway.

Paul Policy: Tighter border security.
What People See: A way to be racist without, ya know, being racist.
Reality: A shitty benefit concert with Gloria Estefan.

Paul Policy: Lower taxes / small government.
What People See: Little House on the Prairie.
Reality: Salute of the Jugger.

Paul Policy: No Department of Education.
What People See: A way to stop liberals from killing Christ in schools.
Reality: Salute of the Jugger, Blu-Ray Collector's Edition.

Paul Policy: No Federal Emergency Management of any kind.
What People See: Freedom to drive around on quad-bikes.
Reality: To r.paul@ronpaul.org, att: Katrina.jpg

Paul Policy: Return to the gold standard.
What People See: Confused by the word 'gold', believe it to be good.
Reality: Switzerland begins minting dubloons again.

Paul Policy: Freedom of religion (but not to be free from religion)
What People See: Christ is coming.
Reality: Cheap real estate in Utah.

Paul Policy: Bearing arms largely unregulated.
What People See: Red Dawn trailer.
Reality: Red Dawn.

Paul Policy: ‘Unshakable foe of abortion’; would let states decide (read: wants it banned but doesn’t have the balls)
What People See: Maybe it wouldn't be so bad.
Reality: “the falcon cannot hear the falconer”, etc.

Paul Policy: Unworkable Constitution returned to its Articles of Confederation heyday.
What People See: A chance to start over?
Reality: Instead of large-scale corruption, all-encompassing corruption.

FUCK RON PAUL Review
...and fuck you for letting it get this far.
by Christian
Viewed: 13349 Times
Posted: 1.28.08

Talk Shit About This Review/Rant in the Ruthless Forum

Syndicate This Review!
(Help us get the word out...add this article to your favorite news & content aggregators.)
Post to del.icio.us Digg This Post to Furl Post to ma.gnolia.com Post to Newsvine Post to Reddit Post to Spurl Post to Yahoo Post to Facebook Post to Facebook Post to Yahoo



USER FEEDBACK


??
What the fuck is the matter with you?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
?? on 1/28/2008 @ 8:16:05
Hmm...
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Gottfried Leibniz on 1/28/2008 @ 1:40:07
HAHA!
I like how the previous libertarian critic thinks he is being cute spewing hollow axioms and thinks he making a point. Fuck these objectivist assholes.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
bastardman on 1/28/2008 @ 6:23:32
You MUST be American
I suppose Ron Paul could seem a bit much, especially when the Death Star is almost complete.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
dicknutz on 1/29/2008 @ 5:16:37
fuck ron paul
He's Australian you idiot.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Cale's FUPA on 1/30/2008 @ 5:45:14
not all his fault
If it weren't for the over the top people supporting him, which I guess is why you hate him, you would have never heard of him, and that is the problem.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
walt on 1/30/2008 @ 4:30:12
Interesting dissection...
I think it just might be possible that you've called this one right. If not correct in all the specifics, the broad strokes paint a surprisingly real picture. Well done. Fuck 'im.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
J.C. on 1/30/2008 @ 6:55:32
Bravo
I think reviewer is a pretty cool guy, eh upsets the rontards and doesn't afraid of anything!
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Anon on 1/30/2008 @ 9:31:30
Why not to vote for Ron Paul:
He is a male gynecologist. And that is weird. Also, his stupid "return to the original intent of the Constitution" mumbojumbo is just retarded. Especially considering that 19 of the current Amendments didn't even exist back then. And just remember that his "internet revolution" of politics is also responsible for the fucking Youtube debates. Once you've realized that, gouge your eyes out and fuck yourself.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
St Even on 1/31/2008 @ 12:48:27
Too much unwarranted hostility, Christian needs to get laid
"Just as it’s true that you can judge any book by its cover" I'm guessing this is why you prefer John Grisham to John Mearsheimer and CNN's pretty graphics to PBS's dull journalism. Your futile attempt at humor throughout this ignorant post does a relatively decent job of hiding the absence of fact within your rant. The dubloon line was definitely cute, but our fiat money system is not a laughing matter. Have you ever worked in the Federal government? Traveled and talked to people fr
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
parabolicstick on 1/31/2008 @ 12:57:22
know what
this's just a hate speech directed against forum member dr.normallove. RON PAUL IS GOING TO WIN THE PRESIDENCY AND THEN YOU WILL BE SORRY!
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
hmong on 1/31/2008 @ 1:13:20
Steve Holt!!
Every reply to a dr.normallove post on here is hate speech. Why? Because he's an idiot, and we hate him. Quite simple, actually. On a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 being epilepsy and 10 being a prolapsed rectum, Norma is an 11.
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Fuck Hmong on 1/31/2008 @ 5:27:29
Yawn...
This is probably the most substantive anti Ron Paul article I've read, but you still spent the better half of it just ridiculing his supporters, as if there aren't half wits behind every candidate. I know it feels cool to stamp out the Ron Paul candidacy, akin to the feeling of making fun of people who listen to a popular band, but aren't there bigger fish to fry than a fringe candidate that will do little more than steal votes from Republicans in the general election?
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Jon on 2/1/2008 @ 2:24:25
ha768@aol.com
which one of you trek mother fuckers started this BS look the white house has been fucked for 20 years now hold on for apocalypse
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
ha768@aol.com on 2/1/2008 @ 9:42:23
asdf
If a Dennis Miller piece is like a bowl of Crunch Berries, this article is the Oops! All Berries version. Beneath the myriad of metaphors and references lay...nothing. I'm actually amazed you managed to make it through that entire article without a single argument against his policies. When I judged your site by its cover, I expected something better, something witty. Instead I found a pile of incoherent rambling, the strongest discernable argument of which being "you have crazy fans." Brav
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
asdf on 2/2/2008 @ 6:18:26
like your site but this article really pissed me off
Ron Paul is the only candidate I know of who wants to substantially change whats going on. Everyone else is just going to continue doing what Bush has done. But you guys who think you're too cool and smart for everything that doesnt fit your view of the world think this is a bad thing somehow. And if you dont believe in the New World Order then fuck you motherfucker and have fun slaving away in the work camps and buying meager rations with your mark of the beast microchip they put in your hand.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
like your site but this article really pissed me off on 2/2/2008 @ 6:25:08
Ron Paul Couldn't do That if he Tried
Look, I think you're not quite understanding how the United States Government works. You see, all of your Ron Paul fears couldn't possibly come true. We have things like a Senate and a House of Representatives and a Supreme Court. Ol' Doctor Paul enjoys USING this system of government. He likes to use it the way it was meant to be used. And, in this system of government? The President has one of the least powerful positions. So you're saying under a Ron Paul candidacy that all of thi
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
William Mac on 2/3/2008 @ 1:10:18
I've read alot of articles making fun of Ron Paul supporters....
But none with valid arguments against the man himself. The Articles of Confederation comment is a blatant lie, and every other Paul policy you've mentioned is a summarily good idea, these policies have been implemented before in the U.S., and in the last 80 years we have strayed from them, look where we are now.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Ward on 2/3/2008 @ 8:12:08
Calelites attack!
"Paul Policy: Lower taxes / small government. What People See: Little House on the Prairie. Reality: Salute of the Jugger." This is about the peak of your ignorance. Anyone who knows the "basic Tenets of Libertarianism" Would tell you that a smaller goverment + lower taxes does NOT equate to a post-apocalyptic hell. The point of a government in this case would to maintain negative freedom through courts, private police arrangements etc. you sir are another Calelite, trying to belittle the
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Mark W on 2/5/2008 @ 5:35:55
Fuck 'em all but Paul!
I'm a faggot-loving pro-abortion atheist and I just voted for RON PAUL, bitch! Fuck all the Shillary-loving neo-liberal suckers of illegal Mexican cock on this site.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Liberal Libertarian on 2/5/2008 @ 4:7:55
You lose points
For posting a picture of Family Guy. And while there is plenty of hypocrisy in Paul's statements, I agree with the general consensus; the article attacks a third party and not the Head Honcho himself. Along with the Rambo and I Know Who Killed Me reviews, this was an obvious attempt to rejuvinate the website, but unlike those two, this one falls flat on its face.
Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Squirrel on 2/11/2008 @ 7:10:23
Weak shit
I read this site regularly and am always more amused than offended. This rant about the only GOP guy who even mentions the COnstitution and or Bill of Rights instead of talking about evil child-raping Islamofascists hiding under your bed and why his version of Nazi Thought Police will protect you This new Christian guy can't even seem to string together a coherent paragraph. Christian, stick to things you know about, like making fun of fat retarded people you work for at Wal*Mart. Then work u
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Doug in Tooksawn on 2/23/2008 @ 7:28:12
Christian's Penis:
I'd say if you are going to talk shit about Ron Paul, you might look at his policies first. Abortion for example. Wrong, oops! Pretty anti-abortion of him to try and pass a piece of legislation that regards human life as starting at conception. Abortion would then be considered murder. As for his other policies, ehh, whatever right? You should actually go vote for Obama or Hillary or McCain and watch our country get a holed F'ked right through it. You smell like shit.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Tobias on 2/29/2008 @ 11:21:19
Suck it
I voted for Ron Paul and I think this is right on.. FUCK HIM
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Lawrence Tureaud on 3/2/2008 @ 6:58:54
What I (An actuall RP supporter and not an imagined one) See:
Paul Policy: Pulls troops out of Korea, Japan and Europe, pulls US out of NATO, UN, WTO, NAFTA. What I See: We shouldn’t be there (as much as we are), NATO, UN, WTO and NAFTA are HORRIBLE. No space or time for an essay here. Paul Policy: Pulls out of International Criminal Court completely. What I See: I have not educated myself on this subject so I do not know. But now that you brought it up, I will. Paul Policy: Pulling out of Iraq completely and immediately. What I See: I do
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Antarez on 5/10/2008 @ 10:50:53
you're an idiot
wow, your nutshell version of pauls policies are retarded and waaaay off the mark you dipshit. how simpleton of you!
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
proud paulista on 6/23/2008 @ 3:24:20
Wanna leave feedback on this review? Click here!
 
       
         


 

 
  A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M
N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
 

RUTHLESS T-SHIRTS
You want ‘em, we got ‘em

JOIN THE RUTHLESS FORUM!


"Old people don't need companionship. They need to be isolated and studied so that it can be determined what nutrients they have that might be extracted for our personal use." -- Homer Simpson

The Quote Du Jour Archive.